Self-enhancement lateral flow immunoassay for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Equipment-free colorimetric-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is the most convenient and popular tool for various applications, including diagnostic tools requiring high sensitivity for the detection of pathogens. Thus, improvements and developments of LFIA are constantly being reported. Herein, we enriched the sensitivity of LFIA using the gold enhancement principle, emphasizing needlessly complicated apparatus, only one step for the strip test operation, and typical time incubation (15 min) process. Self-enhanced LFIA was then executed for subsequent flows by overlapping the additionally enhanced pad composed of gold ions and reducing agent on the conjugate pad and the sample pad. Self-enhanced LFIA was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens in saliva. The obtained result depicted that the achieved sensitivity was up to tenfold compared with that of conventional LFIA by visual measurements. The detection limits of self-enhanced LFIA detecting nucleocapsid protein antigens in the saliva sample was 0.50 and 0.10 ng/mL employed by naked eye detection and calibration curve-based calculation, respectively. When the proposed device was applied to 207 human saliva samples, the diagnostic performance presented a 96.10 % sensitivity and 99.23 % specificity. This self-enhanced LFIA could be implemented in large-scale production and demonstrates higher sensitivity with effortless use, which meets the requirements for point-of-care testing and on-field mass screening.

Immunogenicity of a fractional or full third dose of AZD1222 vaccine or BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine after two doses of CoronaVac vaccines against the Delta and Omicron variants.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the immunogenicity and safety of fractional (half) third doses of heterologous COVID-19 vaccines (AZD1222 or BNT162b2) to full doses after the two-dose CoronaVac and when boosting after three different extended intervals. METHODS: At 60-<90, 90-<120, or 120-180 days intervals after the two-dose CoronaVac, participants were randomized to full-dose or half-dose AZD1222 or BNT162b2, followed up at day 28, 60, and 90. Vaccination-induced immune responses to Ancestral, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 strains were evaluated by antispike, pseudovirus, and microneutralization and T cell assays. Descriptive statistics and noninferiority cut-offs were reported as geometric mean concentration or titer and concentration or titer ratios comparing baseline to day 28 and day 90 and different intervals. RESULTS: No safety concerns were detected. All assays and intervals showed noninferior immunogenicity between full doses and half doses. However, full-dose vaccines and/or longer 120-180-day intervals substantially improved the immunogenicity (measured by antispike or measured by pseudotyped virus neutralizing titers 50; P <0.001). Seroconversion rates were over 90% against the SARS-CoV-2 strains by all assays. Immunogenicity waned more quickly with half doses than full doses but remained high against the Ancestral or Delta strains. Against Omicron, the day 28 immunogenicity increased with longer intervals than shorter intervals for full-dose vaccines. CONCLUSION: Immune responses after day 28 when boosting at longer intervals after the two-dose CoronaVac was optimal. Half doses met the noninferiority criteria compared with the full dose by all the immune assays assessed.

Safety and immunogenicity of a prefusion non-stabilized spike protein mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a phase I trial.

Effective mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are available but need to be stored in freezers, limiting their use to countries that have appropriate storage capacity. ChulaCov19 is a prefusion non-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein-encoding, nucleoside-modified mRNA, lipid nanoparticle encapsulated vaccine that we report to be stable when stored at 2-8 °C for up to 3 months. Here we report safety and immunogenicity data from a phase I open-label, dose escalation, first-in-human trial of the ChulaCov19 vaccine (NCT04566276). Seventy-two eligible volunteers, 36 of whom were aged 18-55 (adults) and 36 aged 56-75 (elderly), were enroled. Two doses of vaccine were administered 21 d apart at 10, 25 or 50 µg per dose (12 per group). The primary outcome was safety and the secondary outcome was immunogenicity. All three dosages of ChulaCov19 were well tolerated and elicited robust dose-dependent and age-dependent B- and T-cell responses. Transient mild/moderate injection site pain, fever, chills, fatigue and headache were more common after the second dose. Four weeks after the second dose, in the adult cohort, MicroVNT-50 geometric mean titre against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 was 848 (95% CI, 483-1,489), 736 (459-1,183) and 1,140 (854-1,522) IU ml-1 at 10, 25 and 50 µg doses, respectively, versus 285 (196-413) IU ml-1 for human convalescent sera. All dose levels elicited 100% seroconversion, with geometric mean titre ratios 4-8-fold higher than for human convalescent sera (P < 0.01), and high IFNγ spot-forming cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The 50 µg dose induced better cross-neutralization against Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta variants than lower doses. ChulaCov19 at 50 µg is well tolerated and elicited higher neutralizing antibodies than human convalescent sera, with strong T-cell responses. These antibodies cross-neutralized four variants of concern. ChulaCov19 has proceeded to phase 2 clinical trials. We conclude that the mRNA vaccine expressing a prefusion non-stabilized spike protein is safe and highly immunogenic.

The impact of the coronavirus disease and Tele-Heart Failure Clinic on cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Tele-HF Clinic (Tele-HFC) program on cardiovascular death, heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, and heart transplantation rates in a cohort of ambulatory HF patients during and after the peak of the pandemic. METHODS: Using the HF clinic database, we compared data of patients with HF before, during, and after the peak of the pandemic (January 1 to March 17 [pre-COVID], March 17 to May 31 [peak-COVID], and June 1 to October 1 [post-COVID]). During peak-COVID, all patients were managed by Tele-HFC or hospitalization. After June 1, patients chose either a face-to-face clinic visit or a continuous tele-clinic visit. RESULTS: Cardiovascular death and medical titration rates were similar in peak-COVID compared with all other periods. HF readmission rates were significantly lower in peak-COVID (8.7% vs. 2.5%, p<0.001) and slightly increased (3.5%) post-COVID. Heart transplant rates were substantially increased in post-COVID (4.5% vs. peak-COVID [0%], p = 0.002). After June 1, 38% of patients continued with the Tele-HFC program. Patients managed by the Tele-HFC program for <6 months were less likely to have HF with reduced ejection fraction (73% vs. 54%, p = 0.005) and stage-D HF (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.001), and more likely to achieve the target neurohormonal blockade dose (p<0.01), compared with the ≥6-month Tele-HFC group. CONCLUSIONS: HF rehospitalization and transplant rates significantly declined during the pandemic in ambulatory care of HF. However, reduction in these rates did not affect subsequent 5-month hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in the setting of Tele-HFC program and continuum of advanced HF therapies.